In this paper, we will investigate how a set of basic assumptions on service coverage, service levels, tariffs, and subsidies in the proposed transactions in Southwest Sri Lanka held up against consumer preferences. If the assumptions underlying the transaction design are flawed, the distribution of benefits between the different stakeholders will be affected and transactions can run into problems. We then propose, in a case where the basic assumptions underlying the PSP transaction design could have been adjusted to especially ensure that the poor will benefit from a PSP transaction. Section 2 of this paper provides the background information and describes the main features of the survey data. Section 3 discusses a set of features that were used in the initial transaction design. Section 4 shows the impact of the different household preferences on these transaction features, and what this means in term of redesigning these features to ensure that the transaction would be more pro-poor. Conclusions and policy recommendations follow in section 5 of the paper.
Table of Contents:
Foreword
1. Introduction
2. Survey Results Socioeconomic Characteristics Water and Sanitation Characteristics
3. Features of the PSP Transactions Universal Service Obligation Service Performance Specifications Tariff and Subsidy Policy Tariff Structure Connection Charges
4. Results from the Household Survey Universal Service Obligation Service Levels and Standards Tariffs, Subsidies and Connection Fees Household Perceptions Conclusions
References
Annex 1. The Sri Lanka Transaction Design
Post Date : 03 Juli 2009
|